Ankündigung

Einklappen
Keine Ankündigung bisher.

"Who's Smarter" - ein Vergleich...

Einklappen
X
  • Filter
  • Zeit
  • Anzeigen
Alles löschen
neue Beiträge

  • "Who's Smarter" - ein Vergleich...

    ...zu dem sich jeder wohl besser selbst seine Meinung machen sollte.

    Jedenfalls habe ich heute im Büro DAS per Mail bekommen:

    Who is Smarter? Cindy Osborne


    The Hollywood group is at it again. Holding anti-war
    rallies, screaming
    about the Bush Administration, running ads in major
    newspapers, defaming
    the President and his Cabinet every chance they get, to
    anyone and everyone
    who will listen. They publicly defile them and call them
    names like
    "stupid" , "morons", and "idiots". Jessica Lange went so far
    as to tell a
    crowd in Spain that she hates President Bush and is
    embarrassed to be an
    American.


    So, just how ignorant are these people who are running the
    country? Let's
    look at the biographies of these "stupid", "ignorant" ,
    "moronic" leaders,
    and then at the celebrities who are castigating them:


    President George W. Bush: Received a Bachelors Degree from
    Yale University
    and an MBA from Harvard Business School. He served as an
    F-102 pilot for
    the Texas Air National Guard. He began his career in the oil
    and gas
    business in Midland in 1975 and worked in the energy
    industry until 1986.
    He was elected Governor on November 8, 1994, with 53.5
    percent of the vote.
    In a historic re-election victory, he became the first Texas
    Governor to be
    elected to consecutive four-year terms on November 3, 1998
    winning 68.6
    percent of the vote. In 1998 Governor Bush won 49 percent of
    the Hispanic
    vote, 27 percent of the African-American vote, 27 percent of
    Democrats and
    65 percent of women. He won more Texas counties, 240 of 254,
    than any
    modern Republican other that Richard Nixon in 1972 and is
    the first
    Republican gubernatorial candidate to win the heavily
    Hispanic and
    Democratic border counties of El Paso, Cameron and Hidalgo.
    (Someone began
    circulating a false story about his I.Q. being lower than
    any other
    President. If you believed it, you might want to go to
    URBANLEGENDS.COM and
    see the truth.)


    Vice President Dick Cheney: Earned a B.A. in 1965 and a M.A.
    in 1966, both
    in political science. Two years later, he won an American
    Political Science
    Association congressional fellowship. One of Vice President
    Cheney's
    primary duties is to share with individuals, members of
    Congress and
    foreign leaders, President Bush's vision to strengthen our
    economy, secure
    our homeland and win the War on Terrorism. In his official
    role as
    President of the Senate, Vice President Cheney regularly
    goes to Capital
    Hill to meet with Senators and members of the House of
    Representatives to
    work on the Administration's legislative goals. In his
    travels as Vice
    President, he has seen first hand the great demands the war
    on terrorism is
    placing on the men and women of our military, and he is
    proud of the
    tremendous job they are doing for the United States of
    America.


    Secretary of State Colin Powell: Was educated in the New
    York City public
    schools, graduating from the City College of New York
    (CCNY), where he
    earned a Bachelor's Degree in geology. He also participated
    in ROTC at CCNY
    and received a commission as an Army second lieutenant upon
    graduation in
    June 1958. His further academic achievements include a
    Master of Business
    Administration Degree from George Washington University.
    Secretary Powell
    is the recipient of numerous U.S. and foreign military
    awards and
    decorations. Secretary Powell's civilian awards include two
    Presidential
    Medals of Freedom, the President's Citizens Medal, the
    Congressional Gold
    Medal, the Secretary of State Distinguished Service Medal,
    and the
    Secretary of Energy Distinguished Service Medal. Several
    schools and other
    institutions have been named in his honor and he holds
    honorary degrees
    from universities and colleges across the country.


    Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld: Attended Princeton
    University on
    Scholarship (AB, 1954) and served in the U.S. Navy (1954-57)
    as a Naval
    aviator ; Congressional Assistant to Rep. Robert Griffin
    (R-MI), 1957-59;
    U.S. Representative, Illinois, 1962-69; Assistant to the
    President,
    Director of the Office of Economic Opportunity, Director of
    the Cost of
    Living Council, 1969-74; U.S. Ambassador to NATO, 1973-74;
    head of
    Presidential Transition Team, 1974; Assistant to the
    President, Director of
    White House Office of Operations, White House Chief of
    Staff, 1974-77;
    Secretary of Defense, 1975-77


    Secretary of Homeland Security Tom Ridge: Was raised in a
    working class
    family in veterans' public housing in Erie. He earned a
    scholarship to
    Harvard, graduating with honors in 1967. After his first
    year at The
    Dickinson School of Law, he was drafted into the U.S. Army,
    where he served
    as an infantry staff sergeant in Vietnam, earning the Bronze
    Star for
    Valor. After returning to Pennsylvania, he earned his Law
    Degree and was in
    private practice before becoming Assistant District Attorney
    in Erie
    County. He was elected to Congress in 1982. He was the first
    enlisted
    Vietnam combat veteran elected to the U.S. House, and was
    overwhelmingly
    re-elected six times.


    National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice: Earned her
    Bachelor's Degree in
    Political Science, Cum Laude and Phi Beta Kappa, from the
    University of
    Denver in 1974; her Master's from the University of Notre
    Dame in 1975; and
    her Ph.D. from the Graduate School of International Studies
    at the
    University of Denver in 1981. (Note: Rice enrolled at the
    University of
    Denver at the age of 15, graduating at 19 with a Bachelor's
    Degree in
    Political Science (Cum Laude). She earned a Master's Degree
    at the
    University of Notre Dame and a Doctorate from the University
    of Denver's
    Graduate School of International Studies. Both of her
    advanced degrees are
    also in Political Science.) She is a Fellow of the American
    Academy of Arts
    and Sciences and has been awarded Honorary Doctorates from
    Morehouse
    College in 1991, the University of Alabama in 1994, and the
    University of
    Notre Dame in 1995. At Stanford, she has been a member of
    the Center for
    International Security and Arms Control, a Senior Fellow of
    the Institute
    for International Studies, and a Fellow (by courtesy) of the
    Hoover
    Institution. Her books include Germany Unified and Europe
    Transformed
    (1995) with Philip Zelikow, The Gorbachev Era (1986) with
    Alexander Dallin,
    and Uncertain Allegiance: The Soviet Union and the
    Czechoslovak Army
    (1984). She also has written numerous articles on Soviet and
    East European
    foreign and defense policy, and has addressed audiences in
    settings ranging
    from the U.S. Ambassador's Residence in Moscow to the
    Commonwealth Club to
    the 1992 and 2000 Republican National Conventions. From 1989
    through March
    1991, the period of German reunification and the final days
    of the Soviet
    Union, she served in the Bush Administration as Director,
    and then Senior
    Director, of Soviet and East European Affairs in the
    National Security
    Council, and a Special Assistant to the President for
    National Security
    Affairs. In 1986, while an international affairs fellow of
    the Council on
    Foreign Relations, she served as Special Assistant to the
    Director of the
    Joint Chiefs of Staff. In 1997, she served on the Federal
    Advisory
    Committee on Gender -- Integrated Training in the Military.
    She was a
    member of the boards of directors for the Chevron
    Corporation, the Charles
    Schwab Corporation, the William and Flora Hewlett
    Foundation, the
    University of Notre Dame, the International Advisory Council
    of J.P. Morgan
    and the San Francisco Symphony Board of Governors. She was a
    Founding Board
    member of the Center for a New Generation, an educational
    support fund for
    schools in East Palo Alto and East Menlo Park, California
    and was Vice
    President of the Boys and Girls Club of the Peninsula. In
    addition, her
    past board service has encompassed such organizations as
    Transamerica
    Corporation, Hewlett Packard, the Carnegie Corporation,
    Carnegie Endowment
    for International Peace, The Rand Corporation, the National
    Council for
    Soviet and East European Studies, the Mid-Peninsula Urban
    Coalition and
    KQED, public broadcasting for San Francisco. Born November
    14, 1954 in
    Birmingham, Alabama, she earned her bachelor's degree in
    political science,
    cum laude and Phi Beta Kappa, from the University of Denver
    in 1974; her
    Master's from the University of Notre Dame in 1975; and her
    Ph.D. from the
    Graduate School of International Studies at the University
    of Denver in
    1981. She is a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and
    Sciences and has
    been awarded Honorary Doctorates from Morehouse College in
    1991, the
    University of Alabama in 1994, and the University of Notre
    Dame in 1995.
    She resides in Washington, D.C.


    So who are these celebrities? What is their education? What
    is their
    experience in affairs of State or in National Security?
    While I will defend
    to the death their right to express their opinions, I think
    that if they
    are going to call into question the intelligence of our
    leaders, we should
    also have all the facts on their educations and background:


    Barbra Streisand : Completed high school
    Career: Singing and acting


    Cher: Dropped out of school in 9th grade.
    Career: Singing and acting


    Martin Sheen Flunked exam to enter University of Dayton.
    Career: Acting


    Jessica Lange Dropped out college mid-freshman year.
    Career: Acting


    Alec Baldwin Dropped out of George Washington U. after
    scandal
    Career: Acting


    Julia Roberts Completed high school
    Career: Acting


    Sean Penn Completed High school
    Career: Acting


    Susan Sarandon Degree in Drama from Catholic University of
    America
    in Washington, D.C.
    Career: Acting


    Ed Asner Completed High school
    Career: Acting


    George Clooney Dropped out of University of Kentucky
    Career: Acting


    Michael Moore Dropped out first year University of Michigan.
    Career: Movie Director


    Sarah Jessica Parker: Completed High School
    Career: Acting


    Jennifer Anniston: Completed High School
    Career: Acting


    Mike Farrell Completed High school
    Career: Acting


    Janeane Garofelo Dropped out of College.
    Career: Stand up comedienne


    Larry Hagman Attended Bard College for one year.
    Career: Acting


    While comparing the education and experience of these two
    groups, we should
    also remember that President Bush and his cabinet are
    briefed daily, even
    hourly, on the War on Terror and threats to our security.
    They are privy to
    information gathered around the world concerning the Middle
    East, the
    threats to America, the intentions of terrorists and
    terrorist-supporting
    governments. They are in constant communication with the
    CIA, the FBI,
    Interpol, NATO, The United Nations, our own military, and
    that of our
    allies around the world. We cannot simply believe that we
    have full
    knowledge of the threats because we watch CNN!! We cannot
    believe that we
    are in any way as informed as our leaders.


    These celebrities have no intelligence-gathering agents, no
    fact-finding
    groups, no insight into the minds of those who would destroy
    our country.
    They only have a deep seated hatred for all things
    Republican. By nature,
    and no one knows quite why, the Hollywood elitists detest
    Conservative
    views and anything that supports or uplifts the United
    States of America.
    The silence was deafening from the Left when Bill Clinton
    bombed a
    pharmaceutical factory outside of Khartoum, or when he
    attacked the Bosnian
    Serbs in 1995 and 1999. He bombed Serbia itself to get
    Slobodan Milosevic
    out of Kosovo, and not a single peace rally was held. When
    our Rangers were
    ambushed in Somalia and 18 young American lives were lost,
    not a peep was
    heard from Hollywood. Yet now, after our nation has been
    attacked on its
    own soil, after 3,000 Americans were killed by
    freedom-hating terrorists
    while going about their routine lives, they want to hold
    rallies against
    the war. Why the change? Because an honest, God-fearing
    Republican sits in
    the White House.


    Another irony is that in 1987, when Ronald Reagan was in
    office, the
    Hollywood group aligned themselves with disarmament groups
    like SANE,
    FREEZE and PEACE ACTION, urging our own government to disarm
    and freeze the
    manufacturing of any further nuclear weapons, in order to
    promote world
    peace. It is curious that now, even after we have heard all
    the evidence
    that Saddam Hussein has chemical, biological and is very
    close to obtaining
    nuclear weapons, their is no cry from this group for HIM to
    disarm. They
    believe we should leave him alone in his quest for these
    weapons of mass
    destruction, even though it is certain that these deadly
    weapons will
    eventually be used against us in our own cities.


    So why the hype out of Hollywood? Could these celebrities
    believe that
    since they draw such astronomical salaries, they are
    entitled to also
    determine the course of our Nation? That they can make
    viable decisions
    concerning war and peace? Did Michael Moore have the backing
    of the Nation
    when he recently thanked France, on our behalf, for being a
    "good enough
    friend to tell us we were wrong"? I know for certain he was
    not speaking
    for me. Does Sean Penn fancy himself a Diplomat, in going to
    Iraq when we
    are just weeks away from war? Does he believe that his High
    School Diploma
    gives him the knowledge (and the right) to go to a country
    that is
    controlled by a maniacal dictator, and speak on behalf of
    the American
    people? Or is it the fact that he pulls in more money per
    year than the
    average American worker will see in a lifetime? Does his
    bank account give
    him clout?


    The ultimate irony is that many of these celebrities have
    made a shambles
    of their own lives, with drug abuse, alcoholism, numerous
    marriages and
    divorces, scrapes with the law, publicized temper tantrums,
    etc. How dare
    they pretend to know what is best for an entire nation! What
    is even more
    bizarre is how many people in this country will listen and
    accept their
    views, simply because they liked them in a certain movie, or
    have fond
    memories of an old television sitcom!


    It is time for us, as citizens of the United States, to
    educate ourselves
    about the world around us. If future generations are going
    to enjoy the
    freedoms that our forefathers bequeathed us, if they are
    ever to know peace
    in their own country and their world, to live without fear
    of terrorism
    striking in their own cities, we must assure that this
    nation remains
    strong. We must make certain that those who would destroy us
    are made aware
    of the severe consequences that will befall them.


    Yes, it is a wonderful dream to sit down with dictators and
    terrorists and
    join hands, singing Cumbaya and talking of world peace. But
    it is not real.
    We did not stop Adolf Hitler from taking over the entire
    continent of
    Europe by simply talking to him. We sent our best and
    brightest, with the
    strength and determination that this Country is known for,
    and defeated the
    Nazi regime. President John F. Kennedy did not stop the
    Soviet ships from
    unloading their nuclear missiles in Cuba in 1962 with mere
    words. He
    stopped them with action, and threat of immediate war if the
    ships did not
    turn around. We did not end the Cold War with conferences.
    It ended with
    the strong belief of President Ronald Reagan...
    Ich enthalte mich vorerst einer Meinungsäußerung, wäre aber gespannt ob andere es ähnlich sehen wie ich

    btw.: der angesprochene Artikel zum IQ von Bush findet sich Hier!
    »We do sincerely hope you'll all enjoy the show, and please remember people, that no matter who you are, and what you do to live, thrive and survive, there are still some things that make us all the same. You, me, them, everybody!«

  • #2
    Nun, ich kann jetzt nicht sagen ob die Datan und "Fakten" über die Regierungsmitglieder stimmen, aber jedenfalls ist diese Meinung die hier vertreten wird typisch für die wirklich überzeugten Anhäner der fasch... ähm der Republikaner !

    Und BTW zeigen diese Daten und Fakten dass in den USA auch wirklich dumme Leute einen guten akademischen Weg nehmen können !
    “Are these things really better than the things I already have? Or am I just trained to be dissatisfied with what I have now?”― Chuck Palahniuk, Lullaby
    They have nothing in their whole imperial arsenal that can break the spirit of one Irishman who doesn't want to be broken - Bobby Sands
    Christianity makes everyone have this mentality that escapism is a bad thing. You know "Don't run away from the real world - deal with it." Why ? Why should you have to suffer? - Marilyn Manson

    Kommentar


    • #3
      Ich hab in letzter Zeit viele solcher Kommentare zu den Meinungsäußerungen von Hollywoodstars gehört und das ganze ist blödsinn. Schon wenn man bei Mr Bush die Aufzählung der Wahlerfolge (könnte man auch die Erfolge der Filmstars aufzählen) weglässt, verkürzt sich der Abschnitt seiner erbrachten Leistungen doch reichlich. Zudem werden intelligente Entscheidungen nicht von Diplomen getroffen.
      Dennoch hab ich mir mal Susan Sarandon (degree in drama) rausgepickt: Sie belegte während ihres Studiums die Fächer Drama, Englisch und militärische Strategien.
      Ansonsten verliert sich der Autor im unteren Abschnitt in der Wiederholung von Propaganda Müll. Seine Urban Legend sollte er vielleicht bei den vorgebrachten Beweise gegen den Irak suchen.
      Wenn er nichts auf die Meinung von Berühmtheiten gibt sollte der Autor vielleicht auf den Großteil der Weltbevölkerung hören. Sein Kennedy Bezug war jedenfalls ebenso schlecht gewählt. Immerhin ist Kennedy in der Kuba Krise eher behutsam vorgeganen und hat nicht auf die Falken im Kabinett gehört.

      Interessant noch, dass die Aufzählung bei Frau Rice garnicht aufhören will. Ihre Leistungen bezüglich der Deutschen Einheit sind auch durchaus würdigenswert. Die Dame hat schon was drauf unterliegt aber auch einem merkwürdigem Glauben an Bush.
      Für einen Euro durch die Spree, nächstes Jahr am Wiener See. - Treffen der Generationen 2013
      "Hey, you sass that hoopy Ford Prefect? There's a frood who really knows where his towel is." (Douglas Adams)

      Kommentar


      • #4
        Hallo!

        Wie hat es George W. Bush bei einer Rede in Yale (?) gesagt? Er ist der lebende Beweis, dass auch durchschnittliche Studenten Präsident der USA werden können

        Es kommt doch viel weniger auf die Intelligenz als auf die guten Beziehungen an. Bush z.B. hatte ja nie irgendwelche Probleme, er wurde einfach von seiner Familie durchgehievt... und wer immer geschrieben hat, dass er in der Ölindustrie war, hat wohl vergessen, dass er so ganz nebenbei ein paar Firmen in den Ruin getrieben hat

        Und gerade wenn Bush & Co. den ganzen lieben langen Tag lang gecoacht werden, ist es doch umso erschreckender wenn Bush nicht mal weiß, wie der Premierminister von Indien heißt (Hallo, dort leben 1 Mill. Menschen!!).

        Überhaupt finde ich diese Gegenüberstellung extrem nichtssagend. Als ob Intelligenz und Bildung, bzw. Bildung und Zivilcourage sowie gesunder Menschenverstand unmittelbar miteinander zu tun haben.
        Vor allem in den USA, wo man für einen Universitätsbesuch ja unglaubliche Summen hinlegen muss, kann sich eben nicht jeder einen Abschluss leisten.
        Das hat aber weder etwas mit den Qualitäten des Menschen zu tun noch mit seiner moralischen Integrität.
        Dieses Mail ist ziemlicher Schwachsinn und argumentativ meiner Meinung nach unhaltbar.

        MfG,
        Fermat Sim

        Kommentar


        • #5
          Auch die Bezeichnung MBA ist nicht eindeutig. Es heist auf jeden Fall "Master of Business-Administration" aber z.B. wird diese Bezeichnung an der FH-Weihenstephan für eigentlich nur für "Master of Business-Administration in Agrikultur" gebraucht.

          Also für Diplom-Landwirte, was jetzt nicht allgemein abwertent sein soll, aber ich denke, es ist nicht sonderlich schwer, in diesem Studiengang durchschnittlich zu sein.
          Planung ist die Ersetzung des Zufalls durch den Irrtum!
          Bilder vom 1. und 4.Treffen

          Kommentar


          • #6
            Ich hatte eigentlich auf eine regere Diskussion gehofft, naja sei's drum....

            Ich finde eigentlich (neben der SEHR willkürlichen Kürzung der Lebensläufe der Schauspielerfraktion und der ebenso willkürlichen Ausbreitung nahezu jeden Details über die Regierungsseite) besonders eine Stelle interessant:

            These celebrities have no intelligence-gathering agents, no fact-finding groups, no insight into the minds of those who would destroy our country.
            Wenn die Regierung wirklich gute "Intelligence Gathering Agents" und Einsicht in die Gedanken derjenigen die angeblich ihr Land zerstören wollen hätte, warum musste dann vor den Vereinten Nationen dermaßen fadenscheiniges Material dran glauben? Selbst wenn es nicht gefaket war, sehr beweiskräftig sind derlei Dinge nun wirklich nicht.

            Oder auch der beliebte Running Gag mit den Massenvernichtungswaffen:

            It is curious that now, even after we have heard all the evidence that Saddam Hussein has chemical, biological and is very close to obtaining nuclear weapons, their is no cry from this group for HIM to disarm. They believe we should leave him alone in his quest for these weapons of mass destruction, even though it is certain that these deadly weapons will eventually be used against us in our own cities.
            Wenn die CIA wirklich die Beweise für derartig massive Programme gehabt hätte, wieso wurde die UNO nicht darauf hingewiesen? Es wäre ein Leichtes gewesen, die Zerstörung von aufgefundenen ABC Waffen anzuordnen, dafür gab es ja die Resolutionen.

            Und was soll eine Formulierung wie "es ist SICHER, daß VIELLEICHT".... entweder ist es gewiß oder es ist möglich, es kann aber nicht gewiß sein daß es möglich wäre...


            Da biegt sich jemand seine Weltsicht gegen die Friedensbewegung zurecht, daß das Gebälk knirrscht.

            Ausserdem wäre ich sehr daran interessiert zu sehen, wie die Lebensläufe der schätzungsweise 500 anderen Prominenten aussahen die auch diese Aufrufe unterschrieben haben sollen... das war ja nicht nur ein Dutzend. Ob da wirklich die wichtigsten Beispiele herausgegriffen wurden oder die passendsten
            »We do sincerely hope you'll all enjoy the show, and please remember people, that no matter who you are, and what you do to live, thrive and survive, there are still some things that make us all the same. You, me, them, everybody!«

            Kommentar


            • #7
              Another irony is that in 1987, when Ronald Reagan was in
              office, the Hollywood group aligned themselves with disarmament groups like SANE, FREEZE and PEACE ACTION, urging our own government to disarm and freeze the manufacturing of any further nuclear weapons, in order to promote world peace. It is curious that now, even after we have heard all the evidence that Saddam Hussein has chemical, biological and is very close to obtaining nuclear weapons, their is no cry from this group for HIM to disarm.
              Neben den fehlenden Beweise ist hier noch was sehr auffallend. Diese Leute unterstützen die Regierung des Landes mit den meisten Massenvernichtungswaffen. Es wird aber kein Wort über die Anthrax-Bestände in den USA, mit denen vor 2 Jahren ein Angriff auf die Führung der Demokraten erfolgte verloren. Mal ganz abgesehen von dem immer noch massiven Atom-Waffen-Beständen. Die USA ist einer der wenigen Staaten, der in den letzten Jahren mit dem Einsatz dieser Waffen gedroht hat (die anderen sind Nordkorea, Pakistan, Indien, Grossbritannien und Israel?) und auch Waffen entwickelt, die sie meinen einsetzen zu dürfen ("taktische" Atomwaffen). In Nature, einer naturwissenschaftlichen Fachzeitschrift, lese ich gerade, dass die USA überlegen C-Waffen einzusetzen und zwar vergleichbar mit dem Giftgas, das in Moskau bei der "Befreiung" der Geiseln über hundert Tote gefordert hat.

              Dieser Text ist typisch für die Verlogenheit und Doppelmoral der Herrschenden in den USA.

              P.S. hier noch ein Beispiel für die "Qualität" der Beweisführung der Bush-Regierung:
              Am Sonntag, den 16. März, sprach Vizepräsident Richard Cheney im Fernsehen und sagte, der Irak habe "tatsächlich seine nuklearen Waffen wieder hergestellt". Knapp fünf Minuten später behauptete er, es sei "nur eine Frage der Zeit, bis er [Saddam Hussein] nukleare Waffen erwirbt." Der schreiende Widerspruch zwischen den beiden Aussagen wurde vom Interviewer nicht hinterfragt. Mohamed ElBaradei hatte Cheneys Behauptung allerdings bereits widerlegt, als er dem Sicherheitsrat berichtete, das es "keinerlei Anzeichen für die Wiederaufnahme nuklearer Aktivitäten" gebe.
              Resistance is fertile
              Für die AGENDA 3010! 30-Stunden-Woche mit vollem Lohnausgleich und 10 Euro gesetzlichem Mindestlohn!
              The only general I like is called strike

              Kommentar


              • #8
                Original geschrieben von Sternengucker
                Und was soll eine Formulierung wie "es ist SICHER, daß VIELLEICHT".... entweder ist es gewiß oder es ist möglich, es kann aber nicht gewiß sein daß es möglich wäre...
                Dazu habe ich eben mal ein Wörterbuch konsultiert, weil ich auch schon so im Gefühl hatte, dass eventually nicht mit "eventuell" gleichzusetzen ist:

                eventually
                dt. schließlich, endlich

                Also kein vielleicht...

                Viel schlagender ist aber, dass der ganze Satz aussagt, die ganzen Anti-Kriegs-Demonstranten wären dafür, Saddam in Ruhe an seinen Waffen basteln zu lassen, und das hat nach meinem Kenntnisstand keiner dieser Leute gefordert...

                Ganz abgesehen davon finde ich es ziemlich kindisch, in so einer Situation einfach die Ausbildung von Bush & Co. mit ein paar ausgewählten US-Schauspielern zu vergleichen. Ein Ausbildungskatalog von was weiß ich für welcher Länge sagt, wie man sieht, doch offenbar gar nichts über die moralische Integrität der betreffenden Damen und Herren aus. Das lernt man nämlich glaube ich nicht an irgendeiner Universität oder gar beim Militär. Ich würde die ganze Aktion eher unter "getroffene Hunde..." einordnen.

                Kommentar

                Lädt...
                X