Sovereign Phaserbänke??

[Raven]

Es ist ganz klar erklärt die Sovi braucht einfach mehr Feuerkraft. während die eine Phaserbank nach vorne feuert, feuert die andere nach hinten

[Sternengucker]

@Hugh

Das mit den Phasern auf der Warpgondel ist schon ne gute Idee.

Allerdings könnte es da eventuell Probleme bei der Sovereign geben, deren Warpgondeln um einiges Schmaler sind als die der Galaxy.

Naja, wenn man will kriegt man das schon hin. Zu Not pfropft man eine Basisplatte auf die der Streifen passt obendrauf also quasi eine kleine Verdickung genau unter dem Phaser
Oder man setzt den Streifen auf eine Seite, oben über die Warpplasmaauslaßgitter drüber, da ist eigentlich doch immer Platz

Übrigens ist mir sowas in DS9 eigendlich aufgefallen.

du meinst wohl "nicht aufgefallen"

Könnte jamand eine bestimmte Szene/Folge nennen?

Ich beziehe mich auf einen Artikel von http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/ar...ip_classes.htm wo geschrieben steht:

Number of Galaxy-class ships Gene Roddenberry once said there should be only six ships of the Galaxy class. The STTNG Technical Manual confirms that only six of them were built at first, plus six additional spaceframes which remained incomplete as of 2368 - corresponding to the fifth season of TNG when the TNGTM was published. On the other hand, so many ships are known by name or were even seen at a time that there should be more than twelve Galaxy-class ships altogether.

Until 2371, three of the six original ships were already lost: the U.S.S. Yamato NCC-71807 in TNG: "Contagion", the U.S.S. Odyssey NCC-71832 in DS9: "The Jem'Hadar" and the U.S.S. Enterprise NCC-1701-D in "Star Trek: Generations". With the U.S.S. Galaxy NCC-70637 as seen in the battle at Chin'toka in 2374 (DS9: "Tears of the Prophets") and the U.S.S. Challenger NCC-71099 as seen in VOY: "Timeless" two of the three remaining ships are already known. The Challenger most likely belongs to this first batch because the registry is lower than the Yamato's.

Apart from these there are at least three more Galaxy-class ships known by name. The U.S.S. Venture NCC-71854 arrived as a reinforcement in DS9: "The Way of the Warrior". It is interesting to note that the Venture is already a class variant, featuring additional structures, probably phaser strips, on the warp nacelles. The U.S.S. Magellan was mentioned as the lead ship of a group that could break through the Dominion lines in DS9: "Sacrifice of Angels", and a Galaxy-class vessel was shown - albeit stock footage from the above arrival of the Venture. The U.S.S. Trinculo NCC-71867 was not actually mentioned, but a studio miniature with this name and number was shown on exhibitions. It is very likely that the so-labeled model was used in one or more DS9 episodes. Given the above ship appearances, it is quite obvious that some of the six remaining spaceframes must have been activated until 2374.

Several Dominion War episodes feature a large number of unnamed Galaxy-class ships seen on screen, most notably "Sacrifice of Angels" where six of them seemed to be present. In addition, "Galaxy wings" were mentioned as subdivisions of the Starfleet forces, and there were at least twelve of them. Given these facts, it is not very likely that only twelve ships were built altogether, even if we should assume that all of the remaining nine ships participated in the battle. Although it may have taken more than a decade to build the first twelve ships, there is no reason to believe that a once established design couldn't be built faster, in a six-year period from 2368 to 2374. Since the according section in the TNGTM describes the construction history of the class, it may be justified to presume that it was decided to eventually build more than twelve ships even prior to 2368. Actually, there seemed to be a Galaxy class under construction at Utopia Planitia and the outer hull largely completed in 2371 (VOY: "Relativity").

Another argument for a higher number than twelve is that two Galaxy-class ships shown in DS9: "Favor the Bold" seem to have a darker neck than other ships of the class, which points to still another variant and to another batch of vessels apart from the original six (including Galaxy, Yamato, Enterprise, Challenger, Odyssey) and the mothballed spaceframes (including Venture and Magellan). Finally, although I firmly believe that much of the starship section in the DS9TM including the "kitbash" theory is wrong, the statement that new ships were commissioned with only one third of their internal volume filled makes sense in particular for the large Galaxy class. Omitting most of the science labs and crew quarters might shorten the building time considerably.

@Tondor

Ich glaube das das ehr einen anderen Grund hat, den soweit ich weiss wurde diese Klasse mehr für den Kampf gebaut.
Und dadurch könnte es sein das die Könstruktöre er auf Sicherheit spekuliert haben und deshalb das Schiff stärker bewafnet haben.

Naja, warum ist dann der große Ring nicht doppelt angelegt? In dieser Form bietet er 15-25 mal soviel "Feuerkraft" wie jeder dieser kleinen Streifen. Und würde nicht nur nach schräghinten/oben schießen können sondern gut 300 Grad in der Seite und 180 Grad in der Höhe und Tiefe abdecken

Ich habe allerdings schon mal etwas vo einer Notfallseparation, oder so ähnlich, gehört.

zB in meinem Post weiter oben?

1.) Das mit dem Trennen dürfte ähnlich wie bei der Voyager gehändelt werden: Nur in allergrößter Not kann man eine nicht ohne Werftmittel wieder rückgängig zu machende Katastrophenabtrennung vornehmen (die Voyager hat dieselbe Platte!)